Overview

The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies (IJAICET) follows a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review process to ensure the quality, originality, integrity, and scholarly significance of all published research. The review process is designed to provide an impartial and objective evaluation of submitted manuscripts while maintaining confidentiality for both authors and reviewers.

All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo editorial screening followed by peer review by qualified experts in the relevant research domain.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

IJAICET employs a Double-Blind Peer Review system in which:

• The identity of authors is concealed from reviewers.
• The identity of reviewers is concealed from authors.
• Reviewers evaluate manuscripts solely on academic merit.
• Editorial decisions are based on reviewer recommendations and editorial assessment.

This process helps minimize bias and promotes fairness, transparency, and academic integrity.

Peer Review Workflow

1. Manuscript Submission
   Authors submit manuscripts through the online journal management system.
2. Initial Editorial Screening
   The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor evaluates the manuscript for relevance, scope, formatting compliance, ethical standards, and overall quality.
3. Plagiarism Screening
   The manuscript may be screened using plagiarism detection software to verify originality.
4. Reviewer Assignment
   The manuscript is assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area.
5. Peer Review Evaluation
   Reviewers assess the manuscript and provide detailed comments and recommendations.
6. Editorial Decision
   The editor reviews the referee reports and makes a publication decision.
7. Revision Stage
   Authors may be requested to revise and resubmit the manuscript based on reviewer feedback.
8. Final Decision
   After successful review and revision, the manuscript may be accepted for publication.

Review Criteria

Reviewers are requested to evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

• Originality and Novelty
• Technical Quality
• Research Methodology
• Scientific Soundness
• Significance of Findings
• Literature Review Quality
• Clarity of Presentation
• Relevance to Journal Scope
• Quality of References
• Overall Contribution to the Field

Editorial Decisions

Based on reviewer reports, one of the following decisions may be issued:

• Accept: Manuscript is accepted without further changes.
• Minor Revision: Small modifications are required before publication.
• Major Revision: Significant revisions are required and the manuscript may undergo additional review.
• Reject: Manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.

The final decision regarding publication rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

• Maintain strict confidentiality.
• Provide objective, constructive, and professional feedback.
• Identify relevant published work not cited by the authors.
• Report any suspected plagiarism, duplication, or ethical concerns.
• Complete reviews within the assigned timeframe.
• Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.

Author Responsibilities

Authors submitting manuscripts to IJAICET must:

• Submit original and unpublished work.
• Ensure the manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.
• Accurately report research methods and results.
• Properly acknowledge all sources.
• Respond to reviewer comments professionally and completely.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts received by the journal are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers shall not disclose any information regarding submitted manuscripts to any third party except as necessary for the peer review process.

Conflict of Interest

Editors and reviewers must disclose any personal, professional, institutional, or financial relationships that could influence their evaluation of a manuscript. Individuals with conflicts of interest shall not participate in the review or editorial decision-making process for the affected submission.

Review Timeline

The journal strives to complete the peer review process in a timely manner.

• Initial Editorial Screening: 3–7 days
• Reviewer Assignment: 3–5 days
• Peer Review Completion: 2–4 weeks
• Revision Period: 1–3 weeks
• Final Decision: 1 week

Actual review durations may vary depending on the availability of reviewers and the complexity of the manuscript.

Publication Ethics

The peer review process is conducted in accordance with recognized principles of academic integrity, transparency, fairness, and ethical publishing practices. Any cases of plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, falsification, or research misconduct will be investigated and handled according to the journal's publication ethics policy.

Contact Information

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies (IJAICET)
Publisher: IJAICET Publications
Email: editor.ijaicet@gmail.com
Website: https://ijaicet.com