Progressive Binding Commitments: Adaptive Consensus-Optimized Cryptographic Frameworks for Secure Blockchain-Based Data Sharing

Authors

  • ATUL VERMA Lakshmi Narain College of Technology (MCA)

Keywords:

Blockchain, Secure Data Sharing, Adaptive Consensus, Reinforcement Learning, Zero-Knowledge Proofs, Hyperledger Fabric

Abstract

Abstract–We propose a Progressive Binding Commitment  Framework (PBCF) that redefines data access and  revocation management in decentralized cloud  environments by decomposing the commitment lifecycle  into three cryptographic states: preliminary, intermediate,  and verified. Traditional blockchain-based data sharing  systems treat every access grant or revocation as a  monolithic transaction requiring immediate finality, which  introduces significant latency and scalability bottlenecks.  The proposed framework addresses this limitation through  a staged Merkle-Patricia Trie hashing mechanism  embedded within the smart contract layer, where each  state corresponds to a progressively stronger binding  between the data access grant and the immutable ledger.  An adaptive consensus routing module, driven by a deep  Q-network reinforcement learning agent, dynamically  selects which commitments to finalize based on real-time  network conditions such as block production interval,  pending transaction queue length, and validator response  time. This agent outputs a policy that prioritizes  preliminary commitments for routine data exchanges  while deferring intermediate-to-verified transitions for  sensitive operations, thereby optimizing throughput and  reducing delay. Furthermore, the framework integrates  asynchronous zero-knowledge proof generation for  permission withdrawal queries, enabling revocation  notifications to propagate within milliseconds via a  dedicated proof-of-stake sidechain without blocking the  main chain’s transaction processing. A policy preprocessor  computes a sensitivity score for each data object using a  gradient-boosted decision tree trained on historical access  patterns, which determines the initial commitment state  and dynamically adjusts thresholds based on network  congestion. The concrete implementation on Hyperledger  Fabric v2.5 demonstrates that the system maintains an  average data sharing latency under 200 milliseconds for  routine operations while cryptographically enforcing sensitive revocations within five seconds, even under 90%  network load. The primary contribution lies in the novel  integration of progressive cryptographic commitments  with adaptive consensus optimization, which  fundamentally improves the scalability and responsiveness  of decentralized data sharing frameworks.

References

[1] I. Makhdoom, I. Zhou, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman, and W. Ni, “PrivySharing: A blockchain-based framework for privacy-preserving and secure data sharing in smart cities,” Computers & Security, 2020.

[2] Z. Ullah, B. Raza, H. Shah, S. Khan, and A. Waheed, “Towards blockchain-based secure storage and trusted data sharing scheme for IoT environment,” IEEE access, 2022.

[3] S. Nakamoto and A. Bitcoin, “A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” Bitcoin.-URL: https://bitcoin. org/bitcoin. pdf, 2008.

[4] V. Buterin, “Proof of stake: How i learned to love weak subjectivity,” Ethereum blog, 2014, 2014.

[5] Z. Rayyan, R. Mahdi, and S. Luthfan, “Blockchain-based secure data sharing in cloud computing,” in Proceeding of the international conference of inovation, science, technology, education, children, and health, 2023.

[6] J. Saltzer, D. Reed, and D. Clark, “End-to-end arguments in system design,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1984.

[7] C. Xu, K. Wang, and M. Guo, “Intelligent resource management in blockchain-based cloud datacenters,” IEEE Cloud Computing, 2017.

[8] M. Castro and B. Liskov, “Practical byzantine fault tolerance,” OsDI, 1999.

[9] T. Chen, H. Lu, T. Kunpittaya, and A. Luo, “A review of zk-snarks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06877, 2022.

[10] E. Ben-Sasson, I. Bentov, Y. Horesh, et al., “Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2018.

[11] S. Umran, S. Lu, Z. Abduljabbar, and V. Nyangaresi, “Multi-chain blockchain based secure data-sharing framework for industrial IoTs smart devices in petroleum industry,” Internet of Things, 2023.

[12] M. Naz, F. Al-Zahrani, R. Khalid, N. Javaid, A. Qamar, et al., “A secure data sharing platform using blockchain and interplanetary file system,” Sustainability, 2019.

[13] S. Reno and K. Roy, “Navigating the blockchain trilemma: A review of recent advances and emerging solutions in decentralization, security, and scalability optimization,” Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print), vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 2061–2119, 2025.

[14] Z. Shen, Q. Qu, and X.-B. Chen, “Blockchain consensus mechanisms: A comprehensive review and performance analysis framework,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 3567, 2025.

[15] A. Muniswamy and R. Rathi, “Trust-based consensus and ABAC for blockchain using deep learning to secure internet of things,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 1, 2025.

[16] M. Aleisa, “Blockchain-enabled zero trust architecture for privacy-preserving cybersecurity in IoT environments,” IEEE Access, 2025.

[17] E. Androulaki, A. Barger, V. Bortnikov, C. Cachin, et al., “Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains,” in Proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference, 2018.

[18] L. Thibault, T. Sarry, and A. Hafid, “Blockchain scaling using rollups: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Access, 2022.

[19] I. Gupta, A. Singh, C. Lee, and R. Buyya, “Secure data storage and sharing techniques for data protection in cloud environments: A systematic review, analysis, and future directions,” IEEe Access, 2022.

[20] I. Ilahi, M. Usama, J. Qadir, M. Janjua, et al., “Challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021.

[21] F. Khayyam, “Enterprise scale privacy preserving data fabric architecture for multi tenant AI driven customer relationship management platforms,” Available at SSRN 6597358, 2026.

[22] H. Jeon, S. Lee, E. Kim, and J. Lee, “Deep reinforcement learning-based fairness and throughput-aware association control algorithm for dense WLAN systems,” Electronics, 2026.

[23] D. Protection, “General data protection regulation,” Intersoft Consulting, Accessed in October, 2018.

[24] M. Yin, D. Malkhi, M. Reiter, G. Gueta, et al., “HotStuff: BFT consensus with linearity and responsiveness,” in Proceedings of, 2019.

[25] H. Dang, T. Dinh, D. Loghin, E. Chang, Q. Lin, et al., “Towards scaling blockchain systems via sharding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on management of data, 2019.

[26] M. K. Bagwani and G. K. Shrivastava, "Comparative analysis of microservices architectures: Evaluating performance, scalability, and maintenance," International Journal on Advances in Engineering Technology and Science, vol. 5, 2023.

[27] M. K. Bagwani, S. Dwivedi, V. Kumar, and P. Koshti, "Transmitting malware through QR codes: Risk analysis and a hybrid detection method," International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1-25, 2026.

[28] A. M. K. Bagwani and V. K. Tiwari, "Preventing malware spread through QR codes: A detection and analysis approach," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 73, pp. 1260-1268, 2024.

[29] A. M. K. Bagwani, V. K. Tiwari, and N. Singh, "Integrating GrapesJS with AWS: Building an educational platform for web development training," An Overview of Literature, Language and Education Research, vol. 10, pp. 106-124, 2025.

[30] M. Bagwani, "Building a cloud-native microservices based web application with GraphQL and Docker," School of Advanced Computing, Sanjeev Agrawal Global Educational University, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20 — Updated on 2026-08-20

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Progressive Binding Commitments: Adaptive Consensus-Optimized Cryptographic Frameworks for Secure Blockchain-Based Data Sharing. (2026). IJAICET - International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 47-59. https://ijaicet.com/index.php/ijaicet/article/view/18