Verifiable Random Function (VRF) Jury and Swarm Secured Routing: A Nature Inspired Cyber Security Framework for Decision Support Systems

Authors

  • Seema Joshi Lakshmi Narain College of Technology Bhopal

Keywords:

Verifiable Random Function (VRF), cybersecurity, Reinforcement learning, Secure routing, Decison support system

Abstract

This paper presents a novel cybersecurity framework for decision support systems, inspired by ecological dynamics and cryptographic randomness. The proposed architecture replaces static routing and centralized security with three tightly integrated modules: a Verifiable Random Function (VRF) Jury Selection Engine, a Distributed Predator-Prey Anomaly Detection Network, and a Reinforcement Learning Adaptive Routing Controller. The core motivation is to eliminate fixed trust anchors and enable adaptive, verifiable oversight without a single point of failure. At each epoch, the VRF engine cryptographically selects a small jury of nodes from the active network, using a public-key-based pseudorandom function and a hash-based ordering. This selection is unpredictable, unbiased, and publicly verifiable by any participant. The jury then executes a bio-inspired anomaly detection algorithm modeled on Lotka-Volterra predator-prey dynamics. Each jury member maintains predator and prey populations for each traffic flow, updated based on packet features extracted by a lightweight one-class support vector machine. Packets are flagged when predator populations exceed a threshold, and a weighted majority vote among jury members produces the final anomaly verdict. This verdict, combined with real-time topology and latency data, feeds into a deep Q-network routing controller. The controller selects optimal next-hop paths while dynamically avoiding nodes with high anomaly scores, using a reward function that penalizes latency, threat proximity, and hop count. The entire system forms a closed loop: the jury oversees every packet, the ecological detector validates threats, and the reinforcement learner reroutes traffic accordingly. We demonstrate that this framework provides strong security guarantees through cryptographic randomness and ecological adaptation, while maintaining scalability through modular integration with existing protocol handlers. The primary contributions are a verifiable, non-deterministic jury selection mechanism, a nature-inspired anomaly detector with decentralized consensus, and a reinforcement learning routing module that jointly optimizes for security and performance.

 

References

[1] R. Bonczek, C. Holsapple, and A. Whinston, “Foundations of decision support systems,” books.google.com, 2014.

[2] D. Power, “Decision support systems: A historical overview,” International Handbooks on Information Systems, 2008.

[3] A. Perrig, R. Szewczyk, V. Wen, D. Culler, et al., “SPINS: Security protocols for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, 2001.

[4] S. Goldberg, J. Vcelak, D. Papadopoulos, and L. Reyzin, “Verifiable random functions (VRFs),” open.bu.edu, 2018.

[5] Y. Gilad, R. Hemo, S. Micali, G. Vlachos, et al., “Algorand: Scaling byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies,” in Proceedings of the 26th ACM symposium on operating systems principles, 2017.

[6] A. Ewees, F. Ismail, R. Ghoniem, and M. Gaheen, “Enhanced marine predators algorithm for solving global optimization and feature selection problems,” Mathematics, 2022.

[7] M. Dorigo and L. Gambardella, “Ant colony system: A cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002.

[8] S. Thrun and M. Littman, “Reinforcement learning: An introduction.” AI Magazine, 2000.

[9] C. Do, N. Tran, C. Hong, C. Kamhoua, et al., “Game theory for cyber security and privacy,” ACM Computing Surveys, 2017.

[10] P. D’haeseleer, S. Forrest, et al., “An immunological approach to change detection: Algorithms, analysis and implications,” in Proceedings, 1996.

[11] M. Islam and M. Merlec, “Proof of random leader: A fast and manipulation-resistant proof-of-authority consensus algorithm for permissioned blockchains using verifiable random function,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025.

[12] H. Wang, X. Liu, and J. Chen, “RVR blockchain consensus: A verifiable, weighted-random, byzantine-tolerant framework for smart grid energy trading,” Computers, 2025.

[13] Y. Zhuang, Y. Chen, X. Zhang, T. Ren, et al., “A large-scale node lightweight consensus algorithm of blockchain for internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024.

[14] C. Rammohan, P. Laxmikanth, D. Srikar, et al., “The BioShield algorithm: Pioneering real-time adaptive security in IoT networks through nature-inspired machine learning,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2023.

[15] S. Qureshi and S. Shandilya, “Nature-inspired adaptive decision support system for secured clustering in cyber networks,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024.

[16] S. Qureshi, S. Padhy, P. Suman, and A. Suman, “Hybrid secure clustered nature-inspired decision support system for secure data communication in cyberspace,” Cyberology, 2025.

[17] N. Wagner, C. Sahin, J. Pena, et al., “A nature-inspired decision system for secure cyber network architecture,” in 2017 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI), 2017.

[18] E. Bouzidi, A. Outtagarts, R. Langar, et al., “Deep q-network and traffic prediction based routing optimization in software defined networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2021.

[19] V. Gupta, S. Shandilya, C. Ganguli, et al., “Data-driven approach to network intrusion detection system using modified artificial bee colony algorithm for nature-inspired cybersecurity,” in International conference on machine learning and data engineering, 2023.

[20] G. Lahbar, Z. Guanghai, D. Prihadi, et al., “SQDeChain: Enhancing tourist trust and destination image through a hybrid AI-blockchain framework for tourism 5.0,” Information Technology & Tourism, 2026.

[21] V. Volterra, “13 fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically,” Foundations of Ecology, 2012.

[22] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Rusu, J. Veness, et al., “Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,” nature, 2015.

[23] B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, J. Shawe-taylor, A. Smola, et al., “Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution, 2001, vol. 13, no. 7,” Neural Computation, issn, 2026.

[24] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das, “Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing,” rfc-editor.org, 2003.

[25] H. Hu, Y. Han, H. Wang, M. Yao, and C. Wang, “Trust-aware secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” ETRI Journal, 2021.

[26] A. Biryukov, B. Fisch, G. Herold, D. Khovratovich, et al., “Cryptanalysis of algebraic verifiable delay functions,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2024.

[27] M. Castro and B. Liskov, “Practical byzantine fault tolerance,” OsDI, 1999.

[28] J. Qi, Q. Zhou, L. Lei, and K. Zheng, “Federated reinforcement learning: Techniques, applications, and open challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11887, 2021.

[29] W. LoweR and A. TAMAR, “Multi agentactor criticfor mixedcooperative competitiveenvironments,” … (NIPS). LongBeach, USA, 2017, 2017.

[30] J. Zhou, G. Cui, Z. Zhang, C. Yang, Z. Liu, and M. Sun, “Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. cite,” arXiv preprint arxiv:1812.08434, 2018, 1812.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Verifiable Random Function (VRF) Jury and Swarm Secured Routing: A Nature Inspired Cyber Security Framework for Decision Support Systems. (2026). IJAICET - International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 20-31. https://ijaicet.com/index.php/ijaicet/article/view/13